jpskill.com
🛠️ 開発・MCP コミュニティ 🔴 エンジニア向け 👤 エンジニア・AI開発者

🛠️ Afrexai API Architect

afrexai-api-architect

APIの設計から開発、テスト、文書

⏱ コードレビュー 1時間 → 10分

📺 まず動画で見る(YouTube)

▶ 【衝撃】最強のAIエージェント「Claude Code」の最新機能・使い方・プログラミングをAIで効率化する超実践術を解説! ↗

※ jpskill.com 編集部が参考用に選んだ動画です。動画の内容と Skill の挙動は厳密には一致しないことがあります。

📜 元の英語説明(参考)

Design, build, test, document, and secure production-grade APIs. Covers the full lifecycle from schema design through deployment, monitoring, and versioning. Use when designing new APIs, reviewing existing ones, generating OpenAPI specs, building test suites, or debugging production issues.

🇯🇵 日本人クリエイター向け解説

一言でいうと

APIの設計から開発、テスト、文書

※ jpskill.com 編集部が日本のビジネス現場向けに補足した解説です。Skill本体の挙動とは独立した参考情報です。

⚡ おすすめ: コマンド1行でインストール(60秒)

下記のコマンドをコピーしてターミナル(Mac/Linux)または PowerShell(Windows)に貼り付けてください。 ダウンロード → 解凍 → 配置まで全自動。

🍎 Mac / 🐧 Linux
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && cd ~/.claude/skills && curl -L -o afrexai-api-architect.zip https://jpskill.com/download/4285.zip && unzip -o afrexai-api-architect.zip && rm afrexai-api-architect.zip
🪟 Windows (PowerShell)
$d = "$env:USERPROFILE\.claude\skills"; ni -Force -ItemType Directory $d | Out-Null; iwr https://jpskill.com/download/4285.zip -OutFile "$d\afrexai-api-architect.zip"; Expand-Archive "$d\afrexai-api-architect.zip" -DestinationPath $d -Force; ri "$d\afrexai-api-architect.zip"

完了後、Claude Code を再起動 → 普通に「動画プロンプト作って」のように話しかけるだけで自動発動します。

💾 手動でダウンロードしたい(コマンドが難しい人向け)
  1. 1. 下の青いボタンを押して afrexai-api-architect.zip をダウンロード
  2. 2. ZIPファイルをダブルクリックで解凍 → afrexai-api-architect フォルダができる
  3. 3. そのフォルダを C:\Users\あなたの名前\.claude\skills\(Win)または ~/.claude/skills/(Mac)へ移動
  4. 4. Claude Code を再起動

⚠️ ダウンロード・利用は自己責任でお願いします。当サイトは内容・動作・安全性について責任を負いません。

🎯 このSkillでできること

下記の説明文を読むと、このSkillがあなたに何をしてくれるかが分かります。Claudeにこの分野の依頼をすると、自動で発動します。

📦 インストール方法 (3ステップ)

  1. 1. 上の「ダウンロード」ボタンを押して .skill ファイルを取得
  2. 2. ファイル名の拡張子を .skill から .zip に変えて展開(macは自動展開可)
  3. 3. 展開してできたフォルダを、ホームフォルダの .claude/skills/ に置く
    • · macOS / Linux: ~/.claude/skills/
    • · Windows: %USERPROFILE%\.claude\skills\

Claude Code を再起動すれば完了。「このSkillを使って…」と話しかけなくても、関連する依頼で自動的に呼び出されます。

詳しい使い方ガイドを見る →
最終更新
2026-05-17
取得日時
2026-05-18
同梱ファイル
2

💬 こう話しかけるだけ — サンプルプロンプト

  • Afrexai API Architect を使って、最小構成のサンプルコードを示して
  • Afrexai API Architect の主な使い方と注意点を教えて
  • Afrexai API Architect を既存プロジェクトに組み込む方法を教えて

これをClaude Code に貼るだけで、このSkillが自動発動します。

📖 Skill本文(日本語訳)

※ 原文(英語/中国語)を Gemini で日本語化したものです。Claude 自身は原文を読みます。誤訳がある場合は原文をご確認ください。

APIアーキテクト — フルライフサイクルAPI開発

本スキルは、本番環境レベルのAPIを設計、構築、テスト、文書化、保護、監視します。単なるcurlコマンドではなく、完全なエンジニアリング手法です。

使用する場面

  • 新しいAPI(REST、GraphQL、またはgRPC)の設計時
  • 既存のAPIの品質、一貫性、またはセキュリティのレビュー時
  • OpenAPI/Swagger仕様の生成または検証時
  • 包括的なテストスイート(ユニット、統合、契約、負荷)の構築時
  • 本番APIの問題のデバッグ時
  • APIのバージョン管理と非推奨化の計画時
  • 監視、レート制限、エラー処理の設定時

フェーズ1:API設計

デザインファーストアプローチ

常にコーディングの前に設計してください。仕様が契約です。

リソースモデリング

このテンプレートを使用して、ドメインをリソースにマッピングします。

# api-design.yaml
service: order-management
base_path: /api/v1
resources:
  - name: orders
    path: /orders
    description: Customer purchase orders
    identifier: order_id (UUID)
    parent: null
    operations: [list, create, get, update, cancel]
    sub_resources:
      - name: line_items
        path: /orders/{order_id}/items
        operations: [list, add, update, remove]
      - name: payments
        path: /orders/{order_id}/payments
        operations: [list, create, get, refund]
    states: [draft, confirmed, processing, shipped, delivered, cancelled]
    transitions:
      - from: draft → to: confirmed (action: confirm)
      - from: confirmed → to: processing (action: process)
      - from: processing → to: shipped (action: ship)
      - from: shipped → to: delivered (action: deliver)
      - from: [draft, confirmed] → to: cancelled (action: cancel)

命名規則チェックリスト

ルール 良い例 悪い例
コレクションには複数形名詞 /users /user, /getUsers
複数語にはケバブケース /line-items /lineItems, /line_items
URLに動詞を含めない POST /orders /createOrder
所有関係にはネストする /users/123/orders /orders?user=123 (主たる関係の場合)
最大3レベルの深さ /users/123/orders /users/123/orders/456/items/789/options
クエリパラメータによるフィルタリング /orders?status=active /active-orders
アクションはサブリソースとして POST /orders/123/cancel PATCH /orders/123 {cancelled:true}

HTTPメソッド — 決定マトリックス

必要事項...                          → メソッド   冪等性?  安全?
リソースまたはコレクションの取得        → GET      はい          はい
新しいリソースの作成               → POST     いいえ          いいえ
リソースの完全な置換          → PUT      はい          いいえ
リソースの部分的な更新        → PATCH    いいえ*          いいえ
リソースの削除                   → DELETE   はい          いいえ
リソースの存在確認            → HEAD     はい          はい
許可されているメソッドのリスト表示                → OPTIONS  はい          はい

* PATCHはJSON Merge Patchを使用する場合、冪等になり得ます

ステータスコード決定木

成功?
├── 新しいものを作成しましたか? → 201 Created (Locationヘッダー)
├── 非同期処理のために受け入れられましたか? → 202 Accepted (ステータスURLを含む)
├── 返すボディがありませんか? → 204 No Content
└── データを返しますか? → 200 OK

クライアントエラー?
├── リクエスト構文が不正ですか? → 400 Bad Request
├── 資格情報がない/無効ですか? → 401 Unauthorized
├── 資格情報は有効だが権限が不十分ですか? → 403 Forbidden
├── リソースが存在しませんか? → 404 Not Found
├── リソースでメソッドが許可されていませんか? → 405 Method Not Allowed
├── 現在の状態と競合していますか? → 409 Conflict
├── リソースが完全に削除されましたか? → 410 Gone
├── バリデーションに失敗しましたか? → 422 Unprocessable Entity
├── リクエストが多すぎますか? → 429 Too Many Requests (Retry-Afterヘッダー)
└── 事前条件に失敗しましたか (etagの不一致)? → 412 Precondition Failed

サーバーエラー?
├── 予期せぬ障害ですか? → 500 Internal Server Error
├── アップストリームの依存関係が失敗しましたか? → 502 Bad Gateway
├── 一時的に過負荷ですか? → 503 Service Unavailable (Retry-After)
└── アップストリームのタイムアウトですか? → 504 Gateway Timeout

リクエスト/レスポンス設計

標準レスポンスエンベロープ

// 成功 (単一リソース)
{
  "data": { "id": "ord_abc123", "status": "confirmed", ... },
  "meta": { "request_id": "req_xyz789" }
}

// 成功 (コレクション)
{
  "data": [ ... ],
  "meta": { "request_id": "req_xyz789" },
  "pagination": {
    "total": 142,
    "page": 2,
    "per_page": 20,
    "total_pages": 8,
    "next": "/api/v1/orders?page=3&per_page=20",
    "prev": "/api/v1/orders?page=1&per_page=20"
  }
}

// エラー
{
  "error": {
    "code": "VALIDATION_FAILED",
    "message": "Request validation failed",
    "details": [
      { "field": "email", "message": "Must be a valid email address", "code": "INVALID_FORMAT" },
      "field": "age", "message": "Must be at least 18", "code": "MIN_VALUE", "min": 18 }
    ]
  },
  "meta": { "request_id": "req_xyz789" }
}

ページネーションパターン — いつどれを使用するか

パターン 使用する場面 利点 欠点
オフセット ?page=2&per_page=20 シンプルなUIページネーション、小規模データセット 実装が簡単、ページジャンプが可能 挿入時のずれ、大きなオフセットで遅い
カーソル ?after=eyJ...&limit=20 無限スクロール、リアルタイムフィード、大規模データセット 一貫性があり、高性能 ページジャンプ不可、不透明なカーソル
キーセット ?created_after=2024-01-01&limit=20 時系列データ、ログ 高速、透過的 ソート可能なフィールドが必要、カウント不可

フィルタリング、ソート、フィールド選択

# フィルタリング
GET /orders?status=active&created_after=2024-01-01&total_min=100

# ソート (降順には - をプレフィックス)
GET /orders?sort=-created_at,total

# フィールド選択 (ペイロードを削減)
GET /orders?fields=id,status,total,customer.name

# 検索
GET /products?q=wireless+headphones

# 組み合わせ
GET /orders?status=active&sort=-created_at&fields=id,status,total&page=1&per_page=10

フェーズ2:OpenAPI仕様

OpenAPI 3.1仕様の生成

設計内の各リソースについて、完全な仕様を生成します。

openapi: 3.1.0
info:
  title: Order Management API
  version: 1.0.0
  description: |
    Order lif
📜 原文 SKILL.md(Claudeが読む英語/中国語)を展開

API Architect — Full Lifecycle API Development

Design, build, test, document, secure, and monitor production-grade APIs. Not just curl commands — a complete engineering methodology.

When to Use

  • Designing a new API (REST, GraphQL, or gRPC)
  • Reviewing an existing API for quality, consistency, or security
  • Generating or validating OpenAPI/Swagger specs
  • Building comprehensive test suites (unit, integration, contract, load)
  • Debugging production API issues
  • Planning API versioning and deprecation
  • Setting up monitoring, rate limiting, and error handling

Phase 1: API Design

Design-First Approach

Always design before coding. The spec IS the contract.

Resource Modeling

Map your domain to resources using this template:

# api-design.yaml
service: order-management
base_path: /api/v1
resources:
  - name: orders
    path: /orders
    description: Customer purchase orders
    identifier: order_id (UUID)
    parent: null
    operations: [list, create, get, update, cancel]
    sub_resources:
      - name: line_items
        path: /orders/{order_id}/items
        operations: [list, add, update, remove]
      - name: payments
        path: /orders/{order_id}/payments
        operations: [list, create, get, refund]
    states: [draft, confirmed, processing, shipped, delivered, cancelled]
    transitions:
      - from: draft → to: confirmed (action: confirm)
      - from: confirmed → to: processing (action: process)
      - from: processing → to: shipped (action: ship)
      - from: shipped → to: delivered (action: deliver)
      - from: [draft, confirmed] → to: cancelled (action: cancel)

Naming Conventions Checklist

Rule Good Bad
Plural nouns for collections /users /user, /getUsers
Kebab-case for multi-word /line-items /lineItems, /line_items
No verbs in URLs POST /orders /createOrder
Nest for ownership /users/123/orders /orders?user=123 (for primary relationship)
Max 3 levels deep /users/123/orders /users/123/orders/456/items/789/options
Filter via query params /orders?status=active /active-orders
Actions as sub-resource POST /orders/123/cancel PATCH /orders/123 {cancelled:true}

HTTP Methods — Decision Matrix

Need to...                          → Method   Idempotent?  Safe?
Get a resource or collection        → GET      Yes          Yes
Create a new resource               → POST     No           No
Full replace of a resource          → PUT      Yes          No
Partial update of a resource        → PATCH    No*          No
Remove a resource                   → DELETE   Yes          No
Check if resource exists            → HEAD     Yes          Yes
List allowed methods                → OPTIONS  Yes          Yes

* PATCH can be idempotent if using JSON Merge Patch

Status Code Decision Tree

Success?
├── Created something new? → 201 Created (Location header)
├── Accepted for async processing? → 202 Accepted (include status URL)
├── No body to return? → 204 No Content
└── Returning data? → 200 OK

Client error?
├── Malformed request syntax? → 400 Bad Request
├── No/invalid credentials? → 401 Unauthorized
├── Valid credentials but insufficient permissions? → 403 Forbidden
├── Resource doesn't exist? → 404 Not Found
├── Method not allowed on resource? → 405 Method Not Allowed
├── Conflict with current state? → 409 Conflict
├── Resource permanently gone? → 410 Gone
├── Validation failed? → 422 Unprocessable Entity
├── Too many requests? → 429 Too Many Requests (Retry-After header)
└── Precondition failed (etag mismatch)? → 412 Precondition Failed

Server error?
├── Unexpected failure? → 500 Internal Server Error
├── Upstream dependency failed? → 502 Bad Gateway
├── Temporarily overloaded? → 503 Service Unavailable (Retry-After)
└── Upstream timeout? → 504 Gateway Timeout

Request/Response Design

Standard Response Envelope

// Success (single resource)
{
  "data": { "id": "ord_abc123", "status": "confirmed", ... },
  "meta": { "request_id": "req_xyz789" }
}

// Success (collection)
{
  "data": [ ... ],
  "meta": { "request_id": "req_xyz789" },
  "pagination": {
    "total": 142,
    "page": 2,
    "per_page": 20,
    "total_pages": 8,
    "next": "/api/v1/orders?page=3&per_page=20",
    "prev": "/api/v1/orders?page=1&per_page=20"
  }
}

// Error
{
  "error": {
    "code": "VALIDATION_FAILED",
    "message": "Request validation failed",
    "details": [
      { "field": "email", "message": "Must be a valid email address", "code": "INVALID_FORMAT" },
      { "field": "age", "message": "Must be at least 18", "code": "MIN_VALUE", "min": 18 }
    ]
  },
  "meta": { "request_id": "req_xyz789" }
}

Pagination Patterns — When to Use Which

Pattern Use When Pros Cons
Offset ?page=2&per_page=20 Simple UI pagination, small datasets Easy to implement, page jumping Drift on inserts, slow on large offsets
Cursor ?after=eyJ...&limit=20 Infinite scroll, real-time feeds, large datasets Consistent, performant No page jumping, opaque cursors
Keyset ?created_after=2024-01-01&limit=20 Time-series data, logs Fast, transparent Requires sortable field, no count

Filtering, Sorting, Field Selection

# Filtering
GET /orders?status=active&created_after=2024-01-01&total_min=100

# Sorting (prefix - for descending)
GET /orders?sort=-created_at,total

# Field selection (reduce payload)
GET /orders?fields=id,status,total,customer.name

# Search
GET /products?q=wireless+headphones

# Combined
GET /orders?status=active&sort=-created_at&fields=id,status,total&page=1&per_page=10

Phase 2: OpenAPI Specification

Generate OpenAPI 3.1 Spec

For each resource in your design, generate a complete spec:

openapi: 3.1.0
info:
  title: Order Management API
  version: 1.0.0
  description: |
    Order lifecycle management.

    ## Authentication
    All endpoints require Bearer token authentication.

    ## Rate Limits
    - Standard: 100 req/min
    - Bulk operations: 10 req/min
  contact:
    name: API Support
    email: api@example.com
  license:
    name: MIT
servers:
  - url: https://api.example.com/v1
    description: Production
  - url: https://staging-api.example.com/v1
    description: Staging

paths:
  /orders:
    get:
      operationId: listOrders
      summary: List orders
      tags: [Orders]
      parameters:
        - $ref: '#/components/parameters/PageParam'
        - $ref: '#/components/parameters/PerPageParam'
        - name: status
          in: query
          schema:
            $ref: '#/components/schemas/OrderStatus'
        - name: created_after
          in: query
          schema:
            type: string
            format: date-time
      responses:
        '200':
          description: Order list
          content:
            application/json:
              schema:
                $ref: '#/components/schemas/OrderListResponse'
        '401':
          $ref: '#/components/responses/Unauthorized'

    post:
      operationId: createOrder
      summary: Create an order
      tags: [Orders]
      requestBody:
        required: true
        content:
          application/json:
            schema:
              $ref: '#/components/schemas/CreateOrderRequest'
            examples:
              basic:
                summary: Basic order
                value:
                  customer_id: "cust_abc"
                  items:
                    - product_id: "prod_xyz"
                      quantity: 2
      responses:
        '201':
          description: Order created
          headers:
            Location:
              schema:
                type: string
              description: URL of created order
          content:
            application/json:
              schema:
                $ref: '#/components/schemas/OrderResponse'
        '422':
          $ref: '#/components/responses/ValidationError'

components:
  securitySchemes:
    BearerAuth:
      type: http
      scheme: bearer
      bearerFormat: JWT

  parameters:
    PageParam:
      name: page
      in: query
      schema: { type: integer, minimum: 1, default: 1 }
    PerPageParam:
      name: per_page
      in: query
      schema: { type: integer, minimum: 1, maximum: 100, default: 20 }

  responses:
    Unauthorized:
      description: Missing or invalid authentication
      content:
        application/json:
          schema:
            $ref: '#/components/schemas/ErrorResponse'
    ValidationError:
      description: Request validation failed
      content:
        application/json:
          schema:
            $ref: '#/components/schemas/ErrorResponse'

security:
  - BearerAuth: []

Spec Quality Checklist (score each 0-2)

# Check Score
1 Every endpoint has operationId /2
2 All parameters documented with types + constraints /2
3 Request bodies have examples /2
4 All error responses documented (400, 401, 403, 404, 422, 429, 500) /2
5 Shared schemas use $ref (DRY) /2
6 Pagination parameters standardized /2
7 Security scheme defined + applied globally /2
8 Description includes auth, rate limits, versioning info /2
9 Response headers documented (Location, Retry-After, ETag) /2
10 Enums used for fixed value sets /2

Score: ___/20 (Target: 16+)


Phase 3: Implementation Patterns

Request Validation Layer

Every endpoint MUST validate before processing:

Validation Order:
1. Content-Type header (reject non-JSON early)
2. Authentication (401 before wasting cycles)
3. Authorization (403 - does this user have access?)
4. Path parameters (404 - does the resource exist?)
5. Query parameters (400 - valid types/ranges?)
6. Request body schema (422 - valid structure?)
7. Business rules (422 - valid state transition?)

Error Handling — Standard Error Codes

Define a consistent error code enum for your API:

# Authentication & Authorization
AUTH_REQUIRED          — No credentials provided
AUTH_INVALID           — Invalid/expired credentials
AUTH_INSUFFICIENT      — Valid credentials, wrong permissions
AUTH_RATE_LIMITED       — Too many auth attempts

# Validation
VALIDATION_FAILED      — Generic validation error (see details array)
INVALID_FORMAT         — Field format wrong (email, UUID, etc.)
REQUIRED_FIELD         — Required field missing
OUT_OF_RANGE           — Value outside allowed range
INVALID_ENUM           — Value not in allowed set

# Resource
NOT_FOUND              — Resource doesn't exist
ALREADY_EXISTS         — Duplicate (unique constraint)
CONFLICT               — State conflict (e.g., already cancelled)
GONE                   — Resource permanently deleted

# Business Logic
INSUFFICIENT_FUNDS     — Payment-related
QUOTA_EXCEEDED         — Usage limit reached
FEATURE_DISABLED       — Feature flag off
DEPENDENCY_FAILED      — Upstream service error

# System
INTERNAL_ERROR         — Unexpected server error
SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE    — Temporarily down
TIMEOUT                — Request took too long

Idempotency

For non-idempotent operations (POST), require an idempotency key:

Request:
POST /orders
Idempotency-Key: ord_req_abc123

Server behavior:
1. Check if Idempotency-Key was seen before
2. If yes → return cached response (same status, same body)
3. If no → process request, cache response for 24h
4. Key format: client-generated UUID or meaningful string

Rate Limiting

Standard headers to include:

X-RateLimit-Limit: 100          # Max requests per window
X-RateLimit-Remaining: 67       # Remaining in current window
X-RateLimit-Reset: 1706886400   # Unix timestamp when window resets
Retry-After: 30                 # Seconds to wait (on 429)

Rate limit tiers:

Tier Limit Window Use Case
Standard 100/min Sliding Normal API calls
Bulk 10/min Sliding Batch operations
Search 30/min Sliding Full-text search
Auth 5/min Fixed Login attempts
Webhook 1000/min Sliding Incoming webhooks

Phase 4: Testing Strategy

Test Pyramid for APIs

        /  E2E  \          — 5-10 critical user flows
       / Contract \        — Schema validation, backward compat
      / Integration \      — Database, external services, auth
     /    Unit Tests  \    — Business logic, validation, transforms
    ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

Test Checklist Per Endpoint

For EVERY endpoint, test these scenarios:

endpoint: POST /orders
tests:
  happy_path:
    - Creates order with valid data → 201
    - Returns created resource with ID
    - Location header points to new resource
    - Timestamps are set (created_at, updated_at)

  validation:
    - Missing required fields → 422 with field-level errors
    - Invalid field types (string where int expected) → 422
    - Empty body → 400
    - Invalid Content-Type → 415
    - Extra unknown fields → ignored or 422 (pick one, be consistent)
    - Boundary values (min/max length, 0, negative, empty string vs null)

  authentication:
    - No token → 401
    - Expired token → 401
    - Invalid token → 401
    - Valid token, wrong scope → 403

  authorization:
    - User accessing own resource → 200
    - User accessing other's resource → 403 or 404 (security choice)
    - Admin accessing any resource → 200

  edge_cases:
    - Duplicate creation (same idempotency key) → same 201 response
    - Concurrent creation race condition → one wins, one gets 409
    - Resource at max relationships → 422
    - Unicode in text fields → handled correctly
    - Very long strings → 422 with max length error
    - SQL injection in params → no effect (parameterized queries)
    - XSS in text fields → stored safely, escaped on output

  performance:
    - Response time < 200ms (p95)
    - List endpoint with 10K records → paginated, < 500ms
    - Bulk operation timeout handling

curl Testing Recipes

# === Setup ===
BASE="https://api.example.com/v1"
TOKEN="your_bearer_token"
alias api='curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" -H "Content-Type: application/json"'

# === CRUD Lifecycle Test ===
# Create
ORDER=$(api -X POST "$BASE/orders" -d '{"customer_id":"cust_1","items":[{"product_id":"prod_1","qty":2}]}')
ORDER_ID=$(echo "$ORDER" | jq -r '.data.id')
echo "Created: $ORDER_ID"

# Read
api "$BASE/orders/$ORDER_ID" | jq .

# Update
api -X PATCH "$BASE/orders/$ORDER_ID" -d '{"notes":"Rush order"}' | jq .

# List with filters
api "$BASE/orders?status=draft&sort=-created_at&per_page=5" | jq .

# Action (state transition)
api -X POST "$BASE/orders/$ORDER_ID/confirm" | jq .

# Delete
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" -X DELETE -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" "$BASE/orders/$ORDER_ID"

# === Error Testing ===
# No auth
curl -s "$BASE/orders" | jq .error

# Invalid body
api -X POST "$BASE/orders" -d '{"invalid": true}' | jq .error

# Not found
api "$BASE/orders/nonexistent" | jq .error

# === Performance ===
# Timing breakdown
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "DNS:%{time_namelookup} TCP:%{time_connect} TLS:%{time_appconnect} TTFB:%{time_starttransfer} Total:%{time_total}\n" -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" "$BASE/orders"

# Quick load test (50 requests, 10 concurrent)
seq 50 | xargs -P10 -I{} curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code} %{time_total}s\n" -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" "$BASE/orders"

Contract Testing

Validate your API hasn't broken backward compatibility:

# contract-tests.yaml
contract:
  name: Order API Contract
  version: 1.0.0

  rules:
    # These changes are SAFE (non-breaking)
    safe:
      - Adding new optional fields to responses
      - Adding new endpoints
      - Adding new optional query parameters
      - Adding new enum values (if clients handle unknown)
      - Widening a constraint (min: 5 → min: 1)

    # These changes are BREAKING
    breaking:
      - Removing a response field
      - Renaming a response field
      - Changing a field type
      - Adding a new required request field
      - Removing an endpoint
      - Narrowing a constraint (max: 100 → max: 50)
      - Changing error response format
      - Removing an enum value

    # Verify after every change
    checks:
      - All existing fields still present in responses
      - All existing field types unchanged
      - All existing required fields still required (no more, no fewer)
      - Default values unchanged
      - Error format unchanged

Phase 5: Security

Security Checklist (audit every API)

authentication:
  - [ ] All endpoints require auth (except /health, /docs, public webhooks)
  - [ ] Tokens expire (short-lived access + long-lived refresh)
  - [ ] Token rotation supported
  - [ ] Failed auth returns 401 with no info leakage
  - [ ] API keys are hashed in storage (never plain text)

authorization:
  - [ ] Resource-level checks (user can only access their data)
  - [ ] Endpoint-level checks (role-based access)
  - [ ] No IDOR vulnerabilities (can't guess other users' resource IDs)
  - [ ] Admin endpoints separately protected
  - [ ] Webhook endpoints verify signatures

input_validation:
  - [ ] All inputs validated server-side (never trust client)
  - [ ] SQL injection prevented (parameterized queries only)
  - [ ] NoSQL injection prevented
  - [ ] Path traversal prevented
  - [ ] Request size limited (body, headers, URL length)
  - [ ] File upload types restricted and scanned

output_security:
  - [ ] No sensitive data in responses (passwords, tokens, internal IDs)
  - [ ] No stack traces in production errors
  - [ ] Consistent error format (no info leakage in different error types)
  - [ ] PII redacted in logs

transport:
  - [ ] HTTPS only (HTTP redirects to HTTPS)
  - [ ] HSTS header set
  - [ ] TLS 1.2+ required
  - [ ] CORS configured restrictively (specific origins, not *)

headers:
  - [ ] X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
  - [ ] X-Frame-Options: DENY
  - [ ] Content-Security-Policy set
  - [ ] No Server version header
  - [ ] Cache-Control: no-store for sensitive endpoints

CORS Configuration

# Restrictive (recommended)
cors:
  origins:
    - https://app.example.com
    - https://admin.example.com
  methods: [GET, POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE]
  headers: [Authorization, Content-Type, X-Request-ID]
  credentials: true
  max_age: 3600

# Common mistakes to avoid:
# ❌ Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *  (with credentials)
# ❌ Reflecting Origin header without validation
# ❌ Allowing all methods/headers

Phase 6: Versioning & Deprecation

Versioning Strategy Decision

Strategy Example Pros Cons Use When
URL path /v1/orders Explicit, easy routing URL pollution Public APIs, multiple major versions
Header API-Version: 2024-01 Clean URLs Hidden, harder to test Internal APIs
Query param ?version=2 Easy to test Pollutes params Quick prototypes
Date-based 2024-01-15 Clear timeline Many versions Stripe-style APIs

Recommended: URL path for major versions, header for minor variations.

Deprecation Playbook

Timeline:
1. T+0: Announce deprecation (docs, changelog, email)
2. T+0: Add Deprecation + Sunset headers to old endpoints
3. T+30d: Log warnings for old endpoint usage
4. T+60d: Email heavy users of old endpoint directly
5. T+90d: Return 299 warning header
6. T+180d: Shut down old endpoint (410 Gone)

Headers:
Deprecation: true
Sunset: Sat, 01 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT
Link: <https://api.example.com/v2/orders>; rel="successor-version"

Migration Guide Template

# Migrating from v1 to v2

## Breaking Changes
1. `user.name` split into `user.first_name` + `user.last_name`
2. Pagination changed from offset to cursor-based
3. Error format updated (see new schema)

## Step-by-Step Migration
1. Update your client SDK to v2 (`npm install @example/sdk@2`)
2. Update response parsing for split name fields
3. Replace `?page=N` with `?after=cursor` pagination
4. Update error handling for new error format

## Compatibility Mode
Set `X-Compat-Mode: v1` header to get v1-style responses from v2 endpoints.
Available until 2025-06-01.

Phase 7: Monitoring & Observability

Key Metrics Dashboard

availability:
  - Uptime percentage (target: 99.9% = 8.7h downtime/year)
  - Health check status (/health endpoint)
  - Error rate (5xx / total requests)

performance:
  - p50 latency (target: < 100ms)
  - p95 latency (target: < 500ms)
  - p99 latency (target: < 1000ms)
  - Throughput (requests/second)
  - Time to first byte (TTFB)

business:
  - Requests per endpoint (usage patterns)
  - Unique API consumers/day
  - Error rate by endpoint
  - Rate limit hits/day
  - Authentication failures/day

infrastructure:
  - Database query time (p95)
  - Connection pool utilization
  - Memory/CPU per instance
  - Queue depth (async operations)

Structured Logging

Every request should log:

{
  "timestamp": "2024-01-15T10:30:00.000Z",
  "level": "info",
  "request_id": "req_abc123",
  "method": "POST",
  "path": "/api/v1/orders",
  "status": 201,
  "duration_ms": 45,
  "user_id": "usr_xyz",
  "ip": "203.0.113.1",
  "user_agent": "MyApp/2.0",
  "request_size": 256,
  "response_size": 1024
}

Health Check Endpoint

// GET /health — for load balancers (simple)
{ "status": "ok" }

// GET /health/detailed — for monitoring (authenticated)
{
  "status": "degraded",
  "version": "1.5.2",
  "uptime_seconds": 86400,
  "checks": {
    "database": { "status": "ok", "latency_ms": 5 },
    "redis": { "status": "ok", "latency_ms": 2 },
    "external_payment_api": { "status": "degraded", "latency_ms": 2500, "error": "timeout" },
    "disk": { "status": "ok", "free_gb": 45.2 }
  }
}

Phase 8: API Review Scoring

When reviewing an existing API, score across these dimensions:

API Quality Rubric (0-100)

Dimension Weight Criteria Score
Design Consistency 20% Naming conventions, HTTP methods, status codes, URL structure /20
Documentation 15% OpenAPI spec, examples, error docs, changelog /15
Error Handling 15% Consistent format, helpful messages, proper codes, no leakage /15
Security 20% Auth, input validation, CORS, headers, no IDOR /20
Performance 15% Latency targets met, pagination, caching headers, N+1 prevented /15
Developer Experience 15% SDK quality, sandbox available, onboarding time, rate limit clarity /15

Score: ___/100

Rating Score Action
🟢 Excellent 85-100 Minor improvements only
🟡 Good 70-84 Address gaps before next major release
🟠 Needs Work 50-69 Prioritize improvements, create tech debt tickets
🔴 Critical <50 Stop feature work, fix fundamentals first

Review Output Template

## API Review: [Service Name]

**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Reviewer:** [Agent]
**Score:** XX/100 (Rating)

### Summary
[2-3 sentence overview of API quality]

### Scores by Dimension
- Design Consistency: X/20 — [key finding]
- Documentation: X/15 — [key finding]
- Error Handling: X/15 — [key finding]
- Security: X/20 — [key finding]
- Performance: X/15 — [key finding]
- Developer Experience: X/15 — [key finding]

### Critical Issues (fix immediately)
1. [Issue + recommendation]

### High Priority (fix this sprint)
1. [Issue + recommendation]

### Nice to Have (backlog)
1. [Issue + recommendation]

### Positive Highlights
- [What's working well]

GraphQL-Specific Guidance

Schema Design Principles

# Good: clear types, nullable where appropriate, connections for lists
type Order {
  id: ID!
  status: OrderStatus!
  customer: Customer!
  items(first: Int, after: String): ItemConnection!
  total: Money!
  createdAt: DateTime!
  updatedAt: DateTime!
}

type Money {
  amount: Int!       # cents, not dollars (avoid float)
  currency: Currency!
}

enum OrderStatus {
  DRAFT
  CONFIRMED
  PROCESSING
  SHIPPED
  DELIVERED
  CANCELLED
}

# Mutations return the modified resource + errors
type CreateOrderPayload {
  order: Order
  errors: [UserError!]!
}

type UserError {
  field: [String!]
  message: String!
  code: ErrorCode!
}

GraphQL Anti-Patterns

Anti-Pattern Problem Fix
No depth limit Query bombs Limit depth to 5-7 levels
No complexity limit Expensive queries Assign cost per field, cap at 1000
N+1 queries Performance death Use DataLoader pattern
No persisted queries Security risk Whitelist queries in production
Exposing internal IDs Leaks implementation Use opaque global IDs
No pagination Memory explosion Use Relay Connection spec

Edge Cases & Gotchas

Timezone Handling

  • Always store and return UTC (ISO 8601: 2024-01-15T10:30:00Z)
  • Accept timezone in input, convert to UTC immediately
  • Never use local server time

Large Payloads

  • Set Content-Length limits (e.g., 1MB default, 10MB for uploads)
  • Use streaming for file uploads (multipart/form-data)
  • Compress responses (Accept-Encoding: gzip)
  • For very large exports → return 202 + poll status endpoint

Eventual Consistency

  • If using async processing, always return 202 + status URL
  • Include estimated completion time when possible
  • Client should poll with exponential backoff

Concurrent Updates

  • Use ETags for optimistic concurrency:
    • GET returns ETag: "v1" header
    • PUT/PATCH sends If-Match: "v1" header
    • Server returns 412 if resource changed since

Webhook Design

  • Include event type, timestamp, and full resource in payload
  • Sign payloads (HMAC-SHA256)
  • Expect retries (make handlers idempotent)
  • Return 200 quickly, process async
  • Include webhook ID for deduplication

Quick Commands

Request Action
"Design an API for [domain]" Run Phase 1 resource modeling + naming
"Generate OpenAPI spec" Run Phase 2 with full components
"Review this API" Run Phase 8 scoring rubric
"Write tests for [endpoint]" Run Phase 4 endpoint checklist
"Security audit this API" Run Phase 5 security checklist
"How should I version this?" Run Phase 6 decision matrix
"Debug this API issue" Check Phase 7 logging + health patterns
"Design GraphQL schema for [domain]" Run GraphQL section

同梱ファイル

※ ZIPに含まれるファイル一覧。`SKILL.md` 本体に加え、参考資料・サンプル・スクリプトが入っている場合があります。