jpskill.com
💼 ビジネス コミュニティ 🟡 少し慣れが必要 👤 経営者・事業責任者・マーケ

📁 ポートフォリオ・ケーススタディ作成

portfolio-case-study-writer

履歴書の箇条書きを「背景→行動→結果」のポートフォリオケーススタディに変換するSkill。

⏱ 求人原稿の改善 半日 → 15分

📺 まず動画で見る(YouTube)

▶ 【自動化】AIガチ勢の最新活用術6選がこれ1本で丸分かり!【ClaudeCode・AIエージェント・AI経営・Skills・MCP】 ↗

※ jpskill.com 編集部が参考用に選んだ動画です。動画の内容と Skill の挙動は厳密には一致しないことがあります。

📜 元の英語説明(参考)

Transform resume bullets into detailed portfolio case studies with context, action, and outcome. Use when the user mentions portfolio, case study, project write-up, or expanding a resume bullet into a longer narrative.

🇯🇵 日本人クリエイター向け解説

一言でいうと

履歴書の箇条書きを「背景→行動→結果」のポートフォリオケーススタディに変換するSkill。

※ jpskill.com 編集部が日本のビジネス現場向けに補足した解説です。Skill本体の挙動とは独立した参考情報です。

⚠️ ダウンロード・利用は自己責任でお願いします。当サイトは内容・動作・安全性について責任を負いません。

🎯 このSkillでできること

下記の説明文を読むと、このSkillがあなたに何をしてくれるかが分かります。Claudeにこの分野の依頼をすると、自動で発動します。

📦 インストール方法 (3ステップ)

  1. 1. 上の「ダウンロード」ボタンを押して .skill ファイルを取得
  2. 2. ファイル名の拡張子を .skill から .zip に変えて展開(macは自動展開可)
  3. 3. 展開してできたフォルダを、ホームフォルダの .claude/skills/ に置く
    • · macOS / Linux: ~/.claude/skills/
    • · Windows: %USERPROFILE%\.claude\skills\

Claude Code を再起動すれば完了。「このSkillを使って…」と話しかけなくても、関連する依頼で自動的に呼び出されます。

詳しい使い方ガイドを見る →
最終更新
2026-05-17
取得日時
2026-05-17
同梱ファイル
1

💬 こう話しかけるだけ — サンプルプロンプト

  • ポートフォリオ・ケーススタディ作成 で、私のビジネスを分析して改善案を3つ提案して
  • ポートフォリオ・ケーススタディ作成 を使って、来週の会議用の資料を作って
  • ポートフォリオ・ケーススタディ作成 で、現状の課題を整理してアクションプランに落として

これをClaude Code に貼るだけで、このSkillが自動発動します。

📖 Claude が読む原文 SKILL.md(中身を展開)

この本文は AI(Claude)が読むための原文(英語または中国語)です。日本語訳は順次追加中。

Portfolio Case Study Writer

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when the user:

  • Wants to create portfolio case studies
  • Needs to expand resume bullets into detailed writeups
  • Is building a portfolio website
  • Wants to showcase project work in depth
  • Mentions: "case study", "portfolio", "project writeup", "work samples", "portfolio piece"

Core Capabilities

  • Transform resume bullets into detailed case studies
  • Structure case studies for maximum impact
  • Create compelling project narratives
  • Balance technical detail with business context
  • Format for portfolio websites
  • Tailor depth to audience

Case Study Purpose

Why Case Studies Matter:

  • Resumes show WHAT you did; case studies show HOW and WHY
  • Demonstrate thinking process, not just outcomes
  • Allow deeper showcase of skills
  • Differentiate you from other candidates
  • Required for many PM, UX, and creative roles

The Case Study Structure

Standard Structure

1. Overview (Project summary)
2. Problem (What needed to be solved)
3. Process (How you approached it)
4. Solution (What you created/delivered)
5. Results (The impact)
6. Learnings (What you'd do differently)

Time to Read

  • Quick Read: 3-5 minutes (essential for portfolio)
  • Deep Dive: 10-15 minutes (for interested readers)

Section-by-Section Guide

1. Overview Section

Purpose: Hook the reader, provide context

Include:

  • Project name and company
  • Your role
  • Timeline
  • Team size
  • One-sentence summary of impact

Example:

# Redesigning the Checkout Flow

**Company:** E-Commerce Inc.
**Role:** Lead Product Designer
**Timeline:** 6 weeks
**Team:** 2 designers, 3 engineers, 1 PM

**Summary:** Reduced cart abandonment by 35% through a streamlined 3-step checkout process, generating $2M in recovered revenue.

2. Problem Section

Purpose: Set up why this work mattered

Include:

  • Business context
  • User pain points
  • Key metrics or goals
  • Constraints

Example:

## The Problem

E-Commerce Inc. was experiencing 68% cart abandonment—significantly higher than the industry average of 55%. Exit surveys and user research revealed several issues:

- **Too many steps:** Our checkout had 7 screens
- **Forced account creation:** Users had to register before purchasing
- **Hidden costs:** Shipping wasn't shown until step 5
- **Mobile friction:** Forms weren't optimized for mobile

**Goal:** Reduce cart abandonment to below 50% within 3 months.

**Constraints:**
- No changes to existing payment integrations
- Had to maintain PCI compliance
- 6-week timeline before holiday season

3. Process Section

Purpose: Show your thinking and methodology

Include:

  • Research conducted
  • Stakeholders involved
  • Hypotheses formed
  • Options considered
  • Decisions made (and why)

Example:

## Process

### Research
I started by understanding the problem deeply:
- Analyzed Mixpanel funnel data for drop-off points
- Conducted 10 user interviews with recent abandoners
- Reviewed heatmaps and session recordings
- Benchmarked against 5 competitor checkout flows

**Key Insight:** 73% of drop-offs occurred at the account creation screen. Users wanted to purchase, not commit to a relationship.

### Ideation
I explored several approaches:
1. Guest checkout only (simplest)
2. Social login options (lower friction)
3. Progressive profiling (collect info over time)
4. One-page checkout (Amazon-style)

After weighing feasibility, timeline, and impact, we chose a hybrid approach...

### Decisions Made
- **Guest checkout first:** Made registration optional and post-purchase
- **Transparent pricing:** Showed shipping on the first screen
- **Mobile-first design:** Designed for mobile, then adapted for desktop
- **Progress indicator:** Added clear "Step 1 of 3" indicator

4. Solution Section

Purpose: Show what you actually created

Include:

  • Visual artifacts (mockups, screenshots, diagrams)
  • Key features/changes
  • Technical implementation (if relevant)
  • How it addressed the problems

Example:

## Solution

### The New Checkout Flow

**Before:** 7 screens with mandatory registration
**After:** 3 screens with optional guest checkout

[IMAGE: Before/After comparison]

### Key Changes

**1. Transparent Pricing Widget**
[IMAGE: Pricing widget mockup]
Showed order total, shipping, and taxes from the start. No surprises.

**2. Guest Checkout Option**
[IMAGE: Guest checkout screen]
Made account creation optional with clear value proposition for why to register.

**3. Smart Form Design**
[IMAGE: Form design]
- Single-column layout on mobile
- Auto-format for phone/card numbers
- Address autocomplete integration
- Clear error messaging

**4. Trust Signals**
Added security badges, money-back guarantee, and customer service contact throughout the flow.

5. Results Section

Purpose: Prove impact with data

Include:

  • Quantitative results (with timeframe)
  • Comparison to goals
  • Secondary metrics affected
  • Business impact

Example:

## Results

### Primary Metrics (90 days post-launch)

| Metric | Before | After | Change |
|--------|--------|-------|--------|
| Cart Abandonment | 68% | 44% | -35% |
| Checkout Completion | 32% | 56% | +75% |
| Mobile Conversion | 18% | 41% | +128% |
| Revenue per Visitor | $2.40 | $3.85 | +60% |

### Business Impact
- **$2M additional revenue** in first quarter
- **15% increase in mobile orders**
- **Customer support tickets about checkout** dropped by 45%

### Secondary Effects
- Account creation actually increased 20% (post-purchase)
- Average order value stayed stable
- Return customer rate improved

6. Learnings Section

Purpose: Show growth mindset and self-awareness

Include:

  • What worked well
  • What you'd do differently
  • Unexpected challenges
  • Skills developed

Example:

## Learnings

### What Worked
- **Early user research** prevented us from building the wrong solution
- **Cross-functional alignment** meetings kept everyone on the same page
- **Launching with analytics** let us measure impact immediately

### What I'd Do Differently
- **More A/B testing:** We launched the full redesign at once. Would have preferred to test individual changes to understand what drove results.
- **Earlier mobile focus:** We designed desktop-first then adapted. Starting mobile-first would have been more efficient.
- **Stakeholder education:** Spent too long convincing leadership. Would start stakeholder alignment earlier next time.

### Skills Developed
- Advanced Figma prototyping
- Working with A/B testing frameworks
- Presenting data-driven design decisions to executives

Case Study Types by Role

Product Manager Case Study

Focus on:

  • Strategy and prioritization
  • Stakeholder management
  • Metrics and outcomes
  • Technical trade-offs

UX/Product Designer Case Study

Focus on:

  • User research
  • Design process
  • Visual artifacts
  • Usability improvements

Software Engineer Case Study

Focus on:

  • Technical architecture
  • Problem-solving approach
  • System design
  • Code quality/performance

Marketing Case Study

Focus on:

  • Strategy and targeting
  • Creative execution
  • Channel performance
  • ROI and attribution

Visual Elements

Must-Have Visuals

  • Before/after comparisons
  • Key screens or deliverables
  • Process diagrams
  • Results charts

Nice-to-Have Visuals

  • User journey maps
  • Wireframes evolution
  • Research artifacts
  • Team photos

Visual Tips

  • Use consistent image sizing
  • Add captions explaining each image
  • Blur sensitive data if needed
  • Ensure mobile-friendly image sizes

Output Format

When creating a case study:

# CASE STUDY: [PROJECT NAME]

## Quick Facts
- **Role:** [Your role]
- **Company:** [Company]
- **Timeline:** [Duration]
- **Team:** [Team composition]
- **Impact:** [One-line result]

---

## Overview
[2-3 sentence summary of the project]

## Problem
[Context and challenges - what needed to be solved]

## Process
### Research
[What you learned]

### Approach
[How you tackled it]

### Key Decisions
[Important choices and rationale]

## Solution
[What you built/created - include visual descriptions]

### Feature 1
[Description]

### Feature 2
[Description]

## Results
[Quantified impact]

| Metric | Before | After | Change |
|--------|--------|-------|--------|

## Learnings
[Reflections and growth]

---

## Visual Asset List
[List of images/screenshots needed]

Case Study Quality Checklist

  • ✅ Clear problem statement
  • ✅ Evidence of user/customer focus
  • ✅ Process clearly explained
  • ✅ Your specific contributions are clear
  • ✅ Quantified results
  • ✅ Visual artifacts included
  • ✅ Honest about challenges/learnings
  • ✅ Appropriate length (3-10 min read)
  • ✅ Proofread and polished
  • ✅ Can discuss in detail in interview